> PWR Instructor Guide
> Technology Resources
> Administrative Deadlines and Program Events
> PWR Newsletter
> PWR Syllabi and Assignments
> Rhetoric Resources
> Pedagogy
> Conferences and Publications
> Teaching Portfolios
 

Facilitating Effective Peer Review Sessions

Students who actively participate in class and in conferences are often loath to read and comment on other students’ work. They may be unfamiliar and uncomfortable with receiving criticism from someone other than the teacher. In addition, they sometimes fear that their peers may take their best ideas. These responses are not surprising in a society characterized by competition and hyper-individualism. However, much theory and research argue that all learning is highly social and that teaching (explaining concepts and ideas to others) is also a powerful aid to learning.

PWR is committed to the use of small-group writing workshops. By acknowledging the resistance students and instructors bring with them, we can work to make these peer groups highly effective. The first and most important work has to do with your own attitude toward peer review. Take time to explain the rationale for using these groups and to demonstrate your commitment to their usefulness. Getting the groups working well together may take several weeks, but with persistence and encouragement from you, they will get there.

Here are some suggestions for successful peer group work:

  • Make sure that the group work counts: assign points for it and hold the students to high standards in their peer reviews;
  • Assign groups early in the term, by at least the third day of class, and keep them small and odd-numbered (3 is probably best for PWR classes);
  • Prepare clear and specific Peer Review Guideline Sheets for each peer review session (see PWR website for samples);
  • Spend some time with each group. Take notes on the students’ activity, not the drafts; on how well the group is working; on who is contributing strong, focused responses; on who needs to improve, and so on;
  • At the end of the session, remind the students to turn in all their peer reviews with their revised essays;
  • Take time to respond briefly but cogently to each peer review, noting areas of strength and weakness and ways in which the reviewer can offer more explicit and helpful advice;
  • Several times each term, ask students to evaluate the progress their group is making by having them list the most important things they have contributed to the group, the most important things each member has contributed, the best aspect of the group, and specific suggestions for improving it;
  • Finally, take time in the next class to refer to some of the best points made in peer review and specify why they are much more helpful than others. Remember that what may seem obvious to you may not seem so to your students.

back to table of contents

TEACHING PRACTICES IN THE PROGRAM IN WRITING AND RHETORIC

Classroom Management Strategies and Issues

Main Office Phone: 650.723.2631 - Student Services Phone: 650.736.7119 - Student Services Email: pwrcourses@stanford.edu
Hours: M-F 8:00 a.m. to noon & 1:00 to 5:00 p.m. - Location: Margaret Jacks Hall (Bldg 460, Rm 223)
Related Sites: VPUE - Department of English - IHUM - FSP - URP