> PWR Instructor Guide
> Technology Resources
> Administrative Deadlines and Program Events
> PWR Newsletter
> PWR Syllabi and Assignments
> Rhetoric Resources
> Pedagogy
> Conferences and Publications
> Teaching Portfolios
 

Contextual Analysis Assignment

Writing 3-A-15
Marvin Diogenes

Assignment: Contextual Analysis of Plato's Gorgias

Due Date: 5:00 p.m. on Friday, February 2 (in my office in Building 460, Room 223).

Length/Format: Your contextual analysis should be six-eight typed, double-spaced pages (1500-2000 words) and include a Works Cited page listing Plato's Gorgias and any other texts you cite in your response. Another primary source that you can use is the "Encomium of Helen." Gorgias, a well-known sophist, was certainly part of Plato's cultural context, important enough to be featured in a dialogue, and thus his speech is a valuable document illustrating ideas and a form of speaking and teaching to which Plato felt compelled to respond. You will also cite at least two secondary sources that help you understand Plato's historical context. Waterfield's introduction and explanatory notes can serve as one secondary source; his bibliography provides many more possible secondary sources. Prepare the paper according to the manuscript format detailed in the syllabus. Remember to turn in your final version in a folder with all earlier drafts, peer review sheets, photocopies of relevant pages from your secondary sources, and a reflection on your process.

Subject and Purpose:

In this dialogue Plato critiques rhetoric as a form of flattery by developing the idea that rhetoric aims to create conviction without knowledge and thus jeopardizes both the audience so persuaded and the rhetorician who pursues worldly power and wealth at the expense of moral behavior and the health of the soul.

What particular historical and cultural contexts was Plato writing in and responding to in this dialogue? How did these contexts influence his persuasive strategies?

In your contextual analysis, provide a close reading of Plato's dialogue (reprising the main task of the rhetorical analysis) and a detailed, well-supported answer to the questions about context above. You may draw on personal experiences with language along with observations of language at work in your culture to contrast Plato's context with your historical moment. In completing this assignment, aim to fulfill two main purposes: read Plato's dialogue closely and critically in order to write a thorough summary integrated into your essay, and explore the historical and cultural contexts in which Plato produced this critique of rhetoric as a way to increase your and your readers' understanding of the dialogue's persuasive strategies.

Plato's characters make many topical references in the dialogue, demonstrating how fully these characters were shaped and influenced by their times. Plato assumes that his audience is familiar with the common sayings and cultural allusions of Athenian culture. In drafting your contextual analysis, consider these references as guides for developing research questions that will lead you to fuller understanding of how and why Plato presents and develops his arguments. Specifically, what current and historical events is Plato responding to? What behaviors and underlying values does he argue for and against?

Back to the Handouts Index


Contextual Analysis Peer Review Guidelines

Writing 3-A-15
Marvin Diogenes

Peer Review Sheet-Contextual Analysis of Plato's Gorgias

Writer's Name:__________________ Reader's Name:___________________

On January 29 and 31, class time will be devoted to peer review. The purpose of peer review is for you to help each other advance beyond the current draft toward the finished paper. To best achieve this purpose, try first to describe what this draft is doing and then move on to suggestions for making the paper more effective. Your goal is not to judge but rather to mirror and offer specific advice. At the end of class, give this sheet with your written comments on it to the writer. You may also write on the back of this sheet. Include the peer review sheet you receive from your partner with the revision you'll be turning in on February 5 (note new due date).

First, read the paper; then write a quick list of dominant impressions. What stands out? What images or metaphors or phrases are particularly vivid? What strikes you as most illuminating about the context and persuasive strategies of Plato's dialogue? After a second reading, answer the questions below.

  1. Describe how the writer introduces the subject and purpose of the paper. More specifically, describe how Plato's dialogue and its context are related to each other in the opening paragraphs. What would make the introduction more effective and engaging?

  2. Describe how the writer summarizes/highlights an issue or issues in Plato's dialogue to establish the need for development and analysis of its context. More specifically, what question or questions about the dialogue is the contextual analysis addressing? What could be more effectively summarized/highlighted to set up and then follow through on the contextual analysis?

  3. Describe how the writer lays out and analyzes Plato's persuasive strategies. Does the writer consistently use clear summary and appropriate quotations from the dialogue and other sources to develop the contextual analysis? How can the writer provide deeper insight into the dialogue?

  4. Describe how the writer develops the historical and cultural context of Plato's dialogue, and how other primary and secondary sources are used to illuminate Plato's strategies in relation to the audience's experiences, values, beliefs, and assumptions?

Back to the Handouts Index


Contextual Analysis Evaluation Criteria

Writing 3-A-15
Marvin Diogenes

Evaluation Criteria for Contextual Analysis

The syllabus includes an overview of the grading standards of the Program in Writing and Rhetoric. To supplement these general criteria, each essay assignment lays out more specific requirements for the particular essay being written. In the case of the Contextual Analysis, as will be the case for all major assignments, the criteria below grow out of the Assignment Sheet and the Peer Review Sheet.

An excellent Contextual Analysis paper will handle the rhetorical situation and elements of composition in the following ways.

Topic: the paper will offer a clear introduction to Plato's dialogue and the context in which it was composed, leading to a consistent focus on its persuasive strategies in relation to its context.

Audience: the paper will demonstrate a strong understanding of university-level readers' expectations of a close reading/contextual analysis of a complex text.

Purpose: the paper will provide in-depth rhetorical and contextual analysis of the persuasive strategies of Plato's dialogue, effectively blending summary and interpretation (what the text means) with the dominant genres of rhetorical and contextual analysis (how the text aims to make meaning and persuade and how it was influenced by its historical and cultural contexts).

Persona: the paper will feature a thoughtful, intellectually inquisitive stance and voice that invite readers to explore and develop their understanding of Plato's dialogue and its context.

The elements of composition will be developed to achieve the paper's purpose:

Content: the paper will provide sustained contextual analysis of Gorgias that is well-supported with quotations from the dialogue and quotations from relevant primary and secondary sources.

Organization: the paper will offer a clear and engaging structure that leads readers through Plato's dialogue and its context, illuminating and connecting the persuasive strategies while effectively balancing summary and interpretation with close reading and contextual analysis.

Style: the paper will include varied and forceful sentences, purposeful and apt diction, and a tone that expresses the writer's engagement with the subject and the value of analysis.

Form: the paper will be formatted according the manuscript guidelines in the syllabus, demonstrating strong control of the conventions of academic discourse in the areas of paragraph structure, punctuation, mechanics, and documentation; the control should be strong enough to allow the writer to push the boundaries of contextual analysis in imaginative and effective ways.

Back to the Handouts Index

Main Office Phone: 650.723.2631 - Student Services Phone: 650.736.7119 - Student Services Email: pwrcourses@stanford.edu
Hours: M-F 8:00 a.m. to noon & 1:00 to 5:00 p.m. - Location: Margaret Jacks Hall (Bldg 460, Rm 223)
Related Sites: VPUE - Department of English - IHUM - FSP - URP